Critics would argue that policies designed for disadvantaged students have also benefited which group?

Critics would argue that policies designed for disadvantaged students have also benefited which group?

• A. Only the most disadvantaged.
• B. Middle-class students.
• C. Only international students.
• D. Older adults.

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is that targeted policies often produce spillover benefits. When resources and reforms are directed at helping disadvantaged students, they usually raise overall school quality—more funding per pupil, better-qualified teachers, richer curricula, safer and more supportive environments, and stronger school programs. These improvements don’t only touch the students who are the explicit focus of the policy; they raise the educational environment for everyone in the school. That means students who aren’t the primary targets, such as middle-class students, can experience higher achievement and more opportunities as a result. International students and older adults aren’t typically the focus of these domestic education policies, so they’re less likely to be the primary beneficiaries.

The main idea here is that targeted policies often produce spillover benefits. When resources and reforms are directed at helping disadvantaged students, they usually raise overall school quality—more funding per pupil, better-qualified teachers, richer curricula, safer and more supportive environments, and stronger school programs. These improvements don’t only touch the students who are the explicit focus of the policy; they raise the educational environment for everyone in the school. That means students who aren’t the primary targets, such as middle-class students, can experience higher achievement and more opportunities as a result. International students and older adults aren’t typically the focus of these domestic education policies, so they’re less likely to be the primary beneficiaries.